Gaaffii Oromoo irratti Ejjennoon Mootummoti Itophiyaa Duris Har’as Tokko Cufamuu WMT ilaalchisee ibsa ABO
Mootummooti Itophiyaa gosa kam illee tahan ummata Oromoo irratti ilaalchaa fi ejjennoo tokkicha qabaachuun gochaa isaaniin mirkaneessanii jiru. Kunis Waldaa Maccaa fi Tuulamaa irratti deddeebia’anii tarkaanfii fudhataniin shakkii tokko malee dhugoomee jira.
Waldaan Maccaa fi Tuulamaa jalqaba irraa kaasee kan ijaarame seera mootummaa Itophiyaa kabajuu fi ittin buluu irratti hundaawee ti. Waldicha kan galmeessee fi waraqaa beekumsaa kan kenneef waajjira mootummaa aangoo itti qabu ture. WMT akkuma waldoota wal gargaarsaa biyya sana keessatti seeraan hojjataa turanitti hojjachaa ture. Mootummaan Itophiya kan mooticha Haile Sillaasee garuu seera mootummaa isaa cabsuun Waldaa Maccaa fi Tuulamaa cufee, hogganoota isaa kaan ajjeessee kaan hidhaatti guure. Yakki waldaan kun hojjate mana seeraatti dhihaatee ilaalamee ragga’e tokko hin turre. Mootummaan Haile Sillaasee Oromoon waldaatti ijaaramee wal gargaaruu isaa waan jibbee fi sodaate irraa waldicha cufe.
– Read More (OromoLiberationFront.org)
2 Comments
Full Programs: 
Ashine said,
November 10, 2011 @ 7:51 am
“… There was a time, when the Oromo freedom fighters wanted to liberate the Oromo people from any sort of subjugation in Ethiopia without trying to demarcate a national area called Oromia; for instance, we can mention the movements like the Raayya Oromo revolt, the Bale Oromo resistance, the initiation of Maccaa Tulama association, the Oromo struggle led by ME’ISON and IC’AT as well as the formation of ENLF (Ethiopian National Liberation Front), which was the forerunner of the OLF. Then, we came in to a situation, which helped some Oromo nationals percieve, accept and respect the existence of an Oromo national area (Oromia) in the Ethiopian empire, but yet without an attempt to separate this area from Ethiopia, the empire, which is said to be build by the blood and bone of the Oromo people. Now we are in the era, when we started to think not only about the existence of the Oromo national area, but also about the necessity of liberating this region in a form of an independent Gadaa republic of Oromia. These three visions (Oromia is the whole Ethiopia, Oromia within Ethiopia, and an independent Oromia without Ethiopia) and the respective political movements are still entertained in the Oromo society at large, the common denominator of the three forces being the struggle for an unconditional bilisummaa/freedom of the Oromo people from any sort of political domination, economic exploitation and cultural suppression. …” http://www.ethiopianreview.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=32520
(Report this comment as inappropriate.)
Seenaa said,
November 11, 2011 @ 4:21 am
Once, it was written in some websites: “…treat our history in three dimensions: 1) as a common proud history of Oromia and Abyssinia, such as the Adwa Battle; 2) as separate parallel histories of Oromia and Abyssinia; 3) as a common conflict history of Oromia and Abyssinia, such as the Minilik invasion and the so-called Oromo expansion…” Now we do see that the consequences of the above three approaches towards our history are the following possible three destinies regarding Oromian sovereignty:
- those Oromo, who do believe in only the common proud history tend to choose liberation of Oromia in Hindi style: the Hindi people liberated all nations and nationalities in their region and named the whole country as India, made Hindi the working language of the Indian federation and of course divided the national area of Hindi into multiple federal regions. Why not we, the Oromo people, liberate the whole nations and nationalities in the Ethiopian empire, call the whole country with the name Oromia and promote Afaan Oromo to the working language of the federation, with the historical local Odaa’s of Oromia (Odaa-Bisil, -Bultum, -Garreess, -Makodi, -Nabee and -Roobaa) being the future separate federal regions of the country?
- those, who tend to accept both the common proud and the conflicting parallel parts of our history opt the liberation in English style: the English people liberated themselves from the 700 years rule of the Roman empire, forged England as an autonomous region and united it with the neighbouring others to form the british United Kingdom, they also made English the working language of the Kingdom. Can’t Oromia being autonomous, free and independent from the alien forces be united with the neighbouring autonomous regions to forge a Cushitic Ethiopian union, similar to that of the british United Kingdom and promote Afaan Oromo to a working language of the union?
- those nationalists, who do percieve only the conflicting parallel history prefer liberation in Ruski style: the Russian elites dismantled the Soviet union and established the Russian federation, which uses the Russian national language, the federation which still does have an influence on its neighbouring nations, because of its economic and military strength. Does this way of dismantling the Ethiopian empire and fostering the highly wished independent Gadaa republic of Oromia to have a further influence over the other liberated neighbouring countries more advantageous than the first two types of sovereignty?
(Report this comment as inappropriate.)